Against
Banning Blood Sports
Katherine
Swanson – Opposition Whip
Question
– If you had to choose which to shoot with your own hands, would
you choose your wife, or your child?
-Morally,
banning hunting necessitates banning use of all animal products,
domestic and free.
-The
very question of banning bloodsports is illogical when you consider
the effects
-domestic
animals are often killed in a slower, more torturous manner than
hunted animals
The
purpose: To reiterate what my colleagues have stated
REFUTATION
- Biblically – nowhere in the Bible does God tell people to refrain from eating meat – we are told to eat meat
- Value of life; PEETA co-founder states outright that animal lives are more valuable than humans
- Hunting and fishing is playing our part in the ecosystem & it's preservation To promote balance by controlling overpopulation and disease
- humans are at the top of the food chain – instructed to eat meat
we
are not exempt from the food chain
- As an Industry – hunting and fishing not only supports families who really do need blood sports to prevent their children from malnutrition
- Supplies retail, factory, and regulation jobs such as fish and game wardens, who prevent people from over-hunting or poaching
- Unity builder – community, family, tradition
>>>Restatement<<<
- According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, hunting is the third-safest sport when compared to 28 other popular sports
- It has a lower injury rate than tackle football, volleyball, and even golf
- I urge you to remember that banning hunting would necessitate banning the use of domestic animal products, including bacon, beef, and leather.
- Imagine a world with no burgers, steaks, leather jackets, or football
- A world of malnourished Americans and a fast-falling economy
Cast
Your Ballots in favor of our beautiful ecosystem-
and
HUMANITY.
No comments:
Post a Comment